DrAjao: Nigeria vs Iran, World Cup 2014: My Crazy Interpre...: Super Eagle? Okay I'll just let you know I don't know much about soccer so stop me when I'm wrong. Nigeria faced Iran at 3PM...
An interesting interpretation
'If I were not African, I wonder whether it would be clear to me that Africa is a place where the people do not need limp gifts of fish but sturdy fishing rods and fair access to the pond. I wonder whether I would realize that while African nations have a failure of leadership, they also have dynamic people with agency and voices'. C N Adiche
Tuesday 17 June 2014
Monday 16 June 2014
On the criminalization of offensive language in private conversation (aka the 'Sterling' effect) through the eyes of a Nigerian
I believe that in Nigeria, we are lucky not to have the
politics of the 'other', a situation that implies the complete objectification
of another group to help to get the primary group to a mental state that will
permit the oppression of the 'other' without moral repugnance. There is
constant use of 'othering' in race, gender and identity politics. In societies
where this othering has formed part of the societal landscape e.g. the USA and
slavery, there have been attempts made to 'unother' the 'other.' To do this
attitudes have to be changed. Attitudes that 'other' are frowned upon and
punished in various ways. But what is the content of the subject of punishment? In
this case, its racism... a racist is punished to either cause him/her to change
or to exhibit to others that such attitudes are repugnant to society. Now if we
examine this clearly, we realise that what is being punished, i.e. the being
racist, is a state of mind. A state of mind is a fact, but it is a fact that is
impossible to prove. The only way to prove it is my words spoken in private or
in public. Now the truth of the matter and the problem rightly identified by many, is that
in themselves words are not racist. Furthermore, a true racist is unlikely to use
such terms in public as he/she is well aware of his own racist nature and will
not want to advertise it. Therefore, we are left with the fact that an
attitude/state of mind can only be punished and proven by statements - and that
should not be conclusive proof. Depending on which society you live in, this
will apply to race, gender, lifestyle, ethnicity, religion etc. My position
therefore is this, racism, misogyny and intolerance of ANY kind is unacceptable.
The purpose of punishments is to change people’s attitudes so the evidence will
of necessity limit a person’s freedom of thought. The other option will be to
allow people to continue in these attitudes and situations such as the
Holocaust, Slavery, Genocide, Apartheid, Jim Crow, will occur unchecked. Because it is the IDEOLOGY that lives on in these events; the names my change, but its evil spirit lives on, stubbornly refusing to die, despite our resolute insistence that we live in a post-racial, degendered, multi-cultural world.
If I had to choose, I would
prefer to curtail my talk in public and in private and give a rethink to my
attitudes about groups I would naturally 'other' for whatever reason than to
live in a world in which 20 million people would be stolen, subject to the
horrendous Middle Passage, used as livestock and sexual objects, tortured and
raped, their offspring though free persistently subject to degradation,
discrimination and humiliation. This does not mean that I think it is a perfect
solution, I just think it is the one we have for now. Any maybe one day, evil othering ideology will cease to be. We can always dream, can't we?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)