What you may ask is the point of these nostalgic reminiscences?
My point is that this ‘child’ marriage issue been going on for ages,
generations even. It has never needed legal validation so why seek it now? That
is the question we should be asking ourselves. This is my own answer.
I start from the premise that contrary to public opinion,
our politicians are EXTREMELY smart. They are so sharp, they can cut diamond. Let
us never be in doubt about that. Calling them names like clueless and silly and
idiot, points the finger back at ourselves while they laugh all the way to bank.
So why were our politicians so eager to amend the age at which one can renounce
Nigerian citizenship?
We should be careful about how we address these issues,
because there are a lot of subtleties in it. The amendment says that anyone can
renounce citizenship as long as they are married. My submission is that this is
a backdoor method to reduce the age of majority. One of the duties which come
with the age of majority is the right to vote. Imagine then what would happen
if ANY married person can vote. This will not have much effect in the South of
Nigeria, but in the North, it would increase the electorate, in my own
estimation, by 25%. This is what is at stake here, electoral power and not paedophilic
lust, though if the latter is satisfied this would be a small bonus.
What has happened is a magician’s trick, a case of
misdirection, while you watch the flourish of his left hand, the card is
concealed in the right. While he blows a noisy flute with his lips, his feet
perform the ‘magic.’ Knowing the track record of Nigerians in ‘support’ of
issues, they know this will die down in a maximum period of three weeks. Remember
fuel subsidy, aluu 5, abia gang rape, even MKO Abiola who people claim not to
remember. I will remind us in 3 weeks exactly and we shall see if we have
forgotten or not. Misdirection!
On the issue of the child marriage, it is amazing the see
the faulty arguments being bandied in support, especially the one which uses ‘I
live in a city,’ we are replying the conclusion without faulting the premises. Someone
said ‘which do you prefer prostitution, rape or child marriage?’ my answer is,
why are those my only choices? That is a false choice argument. If someone says
which do you prefer to be shot in the head, heart or stomach? Your reply would be
nowhere, thank you very much! Take your gun and go somewhere else!
My conclusions therefore are as follows; there is a sinister
reason behind this debate and we are being misdirected to look in the wrong
direction. Secondly, children are being given out in marriage every day, to do
something about it we need sustained protest and not the flash-in-the-pan
antics that we are fond of adopting. Finally, let us be objective and
reflective in our view of issues. Don’t always argue what your adversary wants
you to argue, but look to the bigger picture, look through his eyes. Do not
underestimate. Beware misdirection.
Section 29 (1) Any citizen of Nigeria of full age who wishes to renounce his Nigerian citizenship shall make a declaration prescribed manner for the renunciation. Sub-section 4 states: For the purposes of subsection (1) of this section. (a) "full age" means the age of eighteen years and above; (b) any woman who is married shall be deemed to be of full age.
ReplyDeletewow...food for thought. Lovely article
ReplyDeleteHi Folu. Thanks for the fresh persepective. But what do you make of "for the purposes of subsection 1 of this section"? So, it does not apply to voting.
ReplyDelete@Ayodeji Omotoso, This could be removed without public argument. We do not always pay attention to these things. Let me add a caveat though. These are my thoughts and I have no evidence for this.
ReplyDeleteHello,
ReplyDeleteWe would like to publish this piece and subsequent writings of yours in SANKOFA, our online magazine that focuses on Culture, Literature and Politics. If you would like to give us permission to do so, kindly send us an email at the following address: submissions@sankofa.com.ng . Cheers!